Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Preprints and Continuous Publication in OJS 3.6

The Public Knowledge Project (PKP) has unveiled one of the most transformative updates to the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform:
Preprints and Continuous Publication are now natively integrated in OJS 3.6 — a long-awaited step toward faster, more transparent, and flexible scholarly communication.

Developed under the Open Research Europe (ORE) initiative and funded by the European Commission, this release redefines how journals can manage the flow of research—from first submission to final publication.

“With OJS 3.6, journals can publish preprints, release articles continuously, and update versions without losing transparency.”


🚀 Key Advancements in OJS 3.6

1. Preprint Workflow Integration

Editors can now publish submissions before peer review as Author’s Original (AO) versions, and later upgrade them to Version of Record (VoR) once peer review is complete.

How it works:

  • Submit → Publish as Preprint (AO)
  • Peer review and production → Publish as Version of Record (VoR 1.0)
  • Minor correction → VoR 1.1

This unified workflow means journals no longer need separate systems like OPS to handle preprints.

Example: A paper can be made public as a preprint today and officially released as a peer-reviewed VoR version next month, all within the same OJS installation.

🎥 Watch the official presentation: Preprints and Continuous Publication in OJS 3.6 – thanks to OSS ORE and the European Commission.


2. Continuous Publication Model

Traditionally, OJS tied every article to a journal issue.
Now, with Continuous Publication, that limitation is gone.

Editors can:

  • Publish articles immediately, without waiting for an issue to close.
  • Assign those articles to an issue later, if desired.
  • Organize content thematically using categories rather than issues.

“Publish first, organize later — OJS 3.6 makes it possible.”

This model benefits open-access and fast-moving journals that value immediacy and reader access.


🧭 Adopting the NISO JAV Standard

OJS 3.6 introduces formal terminology and structure through the NISO Journal Article Versioning (JAV) standard.
This ensures interoperability between publishers, repositories, and indexing systems.

Term Meaning Description
Author’s Original (AO) Preprint The author’s version prior to peer review.
Version of Record (VoR) Published Record The final, peer-reviewed and accepted article.
Semantic Versioning Transparent Tracking A structured numbering system: 1.0 (initial), 1.1 (minor correction), 2.0 (major revision).

Each revision is preserved and citable — improving traceability and trust in the scholarly record.


🧩 Three Publishing Models, One Platform

OJS 3.6 allows journals to combine or choose between three workflows:

  1. Traditional Issue-Based Publishing
    • Peer review → Issue assignment → VoR 1.0 publication.
  2. Hybrid Preprint → VoR Publishing
    • Early Preprint (AO) release → later upgraded to VoR 1.0 (and minor updates like 1.1).
  3. Fully Continuous Publishing (No Issues)
    • Articles appear immediately and are organized by categories or thematic collections.
    • Issue-related fields are automatically hidden for simplicity.

Tip: Editors can mix and match — some sections may follow issues, others continuous publication.


⚙️ Simplified Editor Experience

📋 Streamlined Workflow Interface

  • The Version Management tool has been moved to a clear sidebar.
  • The Schedule for Publication button can now be used from the earliest stages.
  • Editors can decide for each article whether it’s a Preprint, VoR, or Continuous Publication item.

🏠 Homepage Display Options

Editors can now select which components appear on the journal’s homepage:

  • Current Issue
  • Most Recent Articles (for continuous publication)
  • Thematic Categories

All can be displayed independently or together.


🔗 DOI, URLs, and Indexing Compatibility

  • Each version (AO and VoR) can have a distinct DOI, with cross-links between them.
  • Article URLs without version identifiers always point to the latest version—ideal for readers.
  • Google Scholar and indexing systems will gradually adapt to versioned metadata as the NISO JAV standard becomes widely recognized.

“Readers always land on the latest version — without losing access to previous ones.”


🧮 Zero-Configuration Philosophy

Gone are the endless checkboxes.
OJS 3.6 introduces a “zero-configuration” approach — editors make decisions at the article level, not in global settings.

Benefits:

  • Cleaner setup screens
  • More flexibility for hybrid workflows
  • Easier long-term maintenance and upgrades

🔮 Roadmap and Performance Outlook

  • OJS 3.5 will serve as the Long-Term Support (LTS) version — stable for large datasets.
  • OJS 3.6 focuses on innovation and testing new workflows like preprints and continuous publication.
  • OJS 3.7 will consolidate these features into the next LTS release.

“3.6 is the testing ground; 3.7 will be the lasting foundation.”

Performance improvements from 3.5 are also being ported to 3.6, ensuring scalability for large journal installations.


🛠️ Coming Soon: In-Platform Typesetting & New Theme

Two major enhancements are in active development:

  1. Integrated Typesetting Workflow
    • Edit article body text directly in OJS.
    • Export polished PDFs and HTML versions without external tools.
  2. Next-Generation Theme System
    • Built-in version badges and clearer “Preprint / VoR” indicators.
    • Cleaner layout and easier customization via the AI-Theme framework.

🧾 Recommendations for Editors

  1. Define Your Publication Policy
    • Clarify how preprints and continuous publication fit into your journal.
  2. Establish a Versioning Policy
    • Use structured versioning: 1.0 → 1.1 → 2.0.
  3. Manage DOI Strategy
    • Assign separate DOIs for AO and VoR, and link them for indexing.
  4. Update Homepage and Theme
    • Highlight version info and preprint notices clearly.
  5. Prepare for Indexing Changes
    • Maintain consistent metadata and clean URLs for versioned content.

📆 Release Timeline and Journal Support

OJS 3.6 is expected to be officially released during 2025.
This version will not be marked as LTS, as it primarily focuses on testing and refining new workflows.
The following version, OJS 3.7, will integrate these features as part of a stable LTS release.

These details are preliminary and may evolve as development progresses.
Once these features are fully stable and available, we will contact all journal managers we serve to provide guidance, migration options, and implementation support.

Commitment: At OJS-Services.com, we ensure every journal stays aligned with the latest, most stable, and standards-compliant OJS evolution.

The post Preprints and Continuous Publication in OJS 3.6 first appeared on OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEM SERVICES.

Journal Metrics: Why They Matter and How to Present Them in Your Journal Website

Introduction: Why Journal Metrics Matter

In today’s publishing world, journals compete not only on the quality of the papers they publish but also on how clearly they communicate their credibility, efficiency, and visibility. Readers, authors, and reviewers are increasingly selective. They want to know: How fast does this journal process submissions? What’s the acceptance rate? Is it indexed in trusted databases? How widely is it read and cited?

That’s where journal metrics come in.
Metrics are not just numbers. They are signposts of trust, evidence of performance, and indicators of future growth. When displayed correctly, journal metrics help authors decide where to submit, reviewers where to invest their time, and institutions which journals to recognize and support.

For journal managers, however, a recurring question is: Which metrics should we present? Where should they appear? In this guide, we’ll break down the most important journal metrics, explain why they matter, and offer practical suggestions on how to showcase them—both on the homepage and in a dedicated “Journal Metrics” or “Statistics” section.

This image shows the metrics section from a custom OJS theme we developed, designed to display key journal statistics in a clear and user-friendly format.


1. Publishing Speed & Process Metrics

One of the first things authors look at is how long it takes to publish in your journal. Nobody wants to wait years for their work to appear. Process-related metrics signal efficiency, transparency, and professionalism.

Key examples include:

  • Days to First Decision: Example – 14 days. Shows how quickly editors respond initially.
  • Submission to Acceptance: Example – 120 days. Communicates the overall timeline authors can expect.
  • Acceptance to Publication: Example – 15 days. Highlights production speed once a paper is accepted.
  • Average Review Time: Example – 35 days. Transparency about peer review efficiency.
  • Time to First Review Assignment: Example – 20 days. Shows how quickly reviewers are engaged.
  • Total Publication Time: Example – 135 days. Summarizes the journey from submission to publication.

Why it matters: Shorter times can make your journal more attractive. Publishing speed also signals strong editorial workflows and reviewer management.

“Instead of reading the full text, you can also watch our video on this topic here:


2. Acceptance & Publishing Statistics

Numbers also tell the story of selectivity and productivity. These statistics highlight both your journal’s scale and its editorial standards.

Examples:

  • Annual Submissions Received: Example – 500 per year.
  • Submissions Accepted: Example – 150.
  • Acceptance Rate: Example – 30%. Indicates competitiveness.
  • Rejection Rate: Example – 70%. Often paired with acceptance.
  • Articles Published per Year: Example – 120. Shows consistency.
  • Number of Issues per Year: Example – 6 issues annually.
  • Special Issues Ratio: Example – 20%. Shows flexibility in publishing thematic collections.

Why it matters: These numbers help authors gauge how competitive your journal is, and help readers understand output volume. High-quality journals balance a healthy submission flow with thoughtful acceptance.


3. Impact & Citation Metrics

Perhaps the most widely recognized, impact and citation metrics demonstrate scholarly influence.

Common examples:

  • Impact Factor (Clarivate): Example – 3.3.
  • 5-Year Impact Factor: Example – 4.2.
  • CiteScore (Scopus): Example – 2.9.
  • Scimago Journal Rank (SJR): Example – 0.65.
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): Example – 1.2.
  • H-Index: Example – 45.
  • Average Citations per Article: Example – 3.1.

Why it matters: These are the metrics universities, funders, and researchers often consider first. They highlight not just the quality of articles, but the journal’s reputation in its field.


4. Access & Indexing Information

Beyond citations, a journal’s access model and indexing profile are key to visibility and compliance.

Important items:

  • Access Type: Open Access vs. Subscription. Example – Open Access.
  • License Type: Creative Commons options (e.g., CC BY 4.0).
  • Article Processing Charge (APC): Example – 1000 USD, or “No APCs”.
  • Indexing Databases: DOAJ, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, TR Dizin, EBSCO, Ulakbim.
  • Plagiarism Check Tools: iThenticate, Turnitin.

Why it matters: Indexing increases discoverability. Access policies affect author trust. Displaying them openly communicates transparency and alignment with international publishing standards.


5. Author & Reviewer Diversity

Academic publishing is global, and diversity metrics reflect inclusivity.

Examples:

  • International Authorship: Example – 60%.
  • Number of Contributing Countries: Example – 40+.
  • Reviewer Pool Size: Example – *800+.
  • Reviewers per Paper: Example – 2.5 on average.
  • Editorial Board Countries: Example – 25 different nations.
  • Gender Diversity Stats: Example – 45% women authors.

Why it matters: These metrics demonstrate a journal’s reach and inclusivity. Many indexers (such as DOAJ and Scopus) consider international diversity a key criterion.


6. Reader Engagement & Visibility

Finally, journals should not ignore reader-facing metrics, which show impact beyond academia.

Examples:

  • Annual Downloads: Example – 150,000+.
  • Downloads per Article: Example – 1,200.
  • Monthly Unique Visitors: Example – 20,000.
  • Altmetric Attention Score: Example – 8.5 average.
  • Social Media Mentions: Example – 1,500 total.
  • Mendeley Readers: Example – 5,000 total / 40 per article.
  • Registered Users or Subscribers: Example – 3,500 members.

Why it matters: These statistics highlight your journal’s visibility, both academically and publicly. They can reassure authors that their work will be widely read and shared.


7. Beyond Numbers: Integrations and Tools

Metrics are powerful, but so are the technical integrations that support visibility and trust. If your journal runs on Open Journal Systems (OJS), you can leverage built-in integrations:

  • ORCID: Enables authors and reviewers to link their publications to a verified researcher ID.
  • Crossref: Ensures DOIs are assigned, making articles permanent and citable.
  • Google Scholar: Increases discoverability.
  • iThenticate/Turnitin: Shows commitment to plagiarism-free publishing.
  • PlumX Metrics: Offers alternative metrics beyond citations.
  • OAI-PMH Protocol: Ensures interoperability with repositories and databases.
  • RSS Feeds: Keeps readers updated.
  • Sitemaps: Improves SEO and indexing by Google.

Why it matters: These integrations make your journal stand out, signaling professionalism and technical maturity.


8. How to Present Journal Metrics

Now that we know what to show, the question is: where to show them?

  • Homepage: Display headline numbers (e.g., Impact Factor, Acceptance Rate, Days to First Decision). Keep it simple and eye-catching.
  • Dedicated “Journal Metrics” Page: Present detailed breakdowns—publishing speed, acceptance statistics, diversity, engagement.
  • Indexing Information: On homepage, show 2–3 key indexes (e.g., DOAJ, Scopus). For the full list, link to a dedicated “Indexing & Databases” page.
  • Always Include “Last Updated” Date: Transparency builds trust. For example: Metrics last updated: March 2025.

9. Why More (Accurate) Metrics = More Visibility

The more accurate and transparent your metrics, the stronger your journal’s profile becomes. Metrics help you:

  • Build trust with authors and reviewers.
  • Improve discoverability with readers and databases.
  • Increase credibility in evaluations and rankings.
  • Enhance scalability for future growth.
  • Strengthen your competitive edge in attracting quality submissions.

Put simply: A journal without visible metrics is like a shop without a signboard. People may walk past, but few will come in.


10. Guidance for Journal Managers

Not all journals are at the same stage.

  • New journals: Focus on process metrics (speed, acceptance rates), access policy, and integrations (DOIs, ORCID, iThenticate).
  • Established journals: Add citation-based metrics (Impact Factor, CiteScore), diversity stats, and reader engagement data.
  • All journals: Keep metrics updated and clear. Outdated or missing data damages credibility.

At the end of the day, the right mix of metrics depends on your journal’s maturity, scope, and audience.


11. Extended Checklist of Journal Metrics

Since every journal is unique, here is a broad list of possible metrics. Journals can select the ones most relevant to their scope and maturity:

  • Publishing Speed & Process: Days to first decision, review time, acceptance to publication, total publication time.
  • Acceptance & Publishing Statistics: Submissions received, accepted, acceptance/rejection rate, articles published, number of issues, special issues.
  • Impact & Citations: Impact Factor, CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, H-Index, citations per article.
  • Access & Indexing: Access type, license, APCs, indexing databases, plagiarism tools.
  • Diversity: International authorship, contributing countries, reviewer pool size, gender diversity.
  • Engagement: Downloads, unique visitors, Altmetrics, social media mentions, Mendeley readers.
  • Technical Integrations: ORCID, Crossref, Google Scholar, iThenticate, PlumX, OAI-PMH, RSS, sitemap.

Note: These metrics vary between journals. Newer journals may not yet have citation metrics, while established ones can showcase both quantitative and qualitative indicators. Pick what’s relevant, but keep expanding as your journal grows.


Conclusion

Journal metrics are more than just numbers—they are a communication tool. They tell authors that your journal is efficient, respected, and trustworthy. They reassure reviewers that their time is valued. They show readers that published research is widely read and cited.

By strategically presenting metrics on your website—highlighting a few on the homepage, and listing a comprehensive set on a dedicated page—you can strengthen your journal’s visibility, impact, and reputation.

At OJS Services, we help journals achieve exactly that. From new journal setup to OJS upgrades, from plugin integrations to custom theme development, we provide the technical and strategic support you need to present your journal at its very best.

The post Journal Metrics: Why They Matter and How to Present Them in Your Journal Website first appeared on OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEM SERVICES.

❌